AIM: To systematically compare the efficacy and safety of off-label bevacizumab versus licensed ranibizumab intravitreal injections as well as monthly regimen versus pro re nata [PRN(as needed)] regimen in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration(n AMD).METHODS: Relevant publications were identified through automatically retrieve of database and manually retrieving. The methodological quality of studies included was assessed using the Jadad score and the risk-of-bias assessment. The efficacy estimates were measured by the weight mean difference(WMD) for the improvement of best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA) and central retinal thickness(CRT) reduction. The safety estimates were measured by odds ratios(OR) for adverse events rates. Statistical analysis was conducted by Revman 5.2.7.RESULTS: Seven studies were included in the Metaanalysis. There were no statistically significant differences between bevacizumab and ranibizumab in BCVA at 1 and 2y(P =0.37, P =0.18, respectively),However, both drugs has better BCVA given monthly than given as needed at 1 and 2y(P <0.05). The results demonstrated the mean decrease in CRT was less in bevacizumab group than ranibizumab group at 1y(P <0.05),while the difference was not significant at 2y(P =0.24).Treatment monthly gained much more decrease in CRT at 1 and 2y(P <0.005).There were no differences between drugs in the rates of death, arterial thrombotic events and venous thrombotic events(P =0.41, P =0.55, P =0.10,respectively), while the rates of medical dictionary for regulatory activities(Med DAR) system organ class events and ≥1 systemic serious adverse events were higher in bevacizumab group than ranibizumab group(P <0.05).But the incidences of death, arterial thrombotic events,venous thrombotic events, Med DAR system organ class events as well as ≥1 systemic serious adverse events were not statistically different between both treatment regimens of monthly and as needed(P =0.14, P =0.76,P =0.73, P =0.12, P =0.11, respectively).· CONCLU
AIMTo compare the efficacy of the sole intravitreal triamcinolone (IVT) versus intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) alone or IVB combined with IVT in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME).